引用本文:刘兰苑,岑碧瑜,麦蔼欣.彩色多普勒超声经腹部检查与经阴道检查在瘢痕妊娠诊断中的价值对比分析[J].中国临床新医学,2018,11(6):588-590.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2484次   下载 1527 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
彩色多普勒超声经腹部检查与经阴道检查在瘢痕妊娠诊断中的价值对比分析
刘兰苑,岑碧瑜,麦蔼欣
528300 广东,南方医科大学顺德医院(佛山市顺德区第一人民医院)功能科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 对比彩色多普勒超声经腹部检查与经阴道检查在瘢痕妊娠(scar pregnancy,CSP)诊断中应用价值,旨在为今后临床CSP诊断提供参考与借鉴。方法 选取2015-12~2017-11该院收治疑似CSP患者58例,所有患者均在医师指导下分别行彩色多普勒超声经腹部检查与阴道彩色多普勒超声检查,其检查结果与手术后病理结果比较,对比两种彩色多普勒超声检查诊断灵敏度、特异度及符合率。结果 经阴道超声在瘢痕子宫中诊断灵敏度、特异度均高于经腹部超声超声诊断(97.37% vs 81.58%,95.00% vs 75.00%,P<0.05)。38例患者经腹部彩色多普勒超声检查,其囊样回声、孕囊、混杂回声检出总例数31例,而经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查其检出总例数37例,经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查诊断符合率显著高于经腹部彩色多普勒超声检查,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查在CSP诊断中具有较高的诊断符合率,比经腹部彩色多普勒超声检查更具临床优越性,对CSP早期诊疗有十分重要的意义。
关键词:  经腹部彩色多普勒超声  经阴道彩色多普勒超声  瘢痕妊娠  诊断价值
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2018.06.19
分类号:R 445
基金项目:
Comparative analysis of Doppler ultrasound between abdominal examination and vaginal examination in diagnosis of scar pregnancy
LIU Lan-yuan, CEN Bi-yu, MAI Ai-xin
Department of Function, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University(the First People′s Hospital of Shunde District, Foshan City), Guangdong 528300, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To compare the diagnostic value of Doppler ultrasound between abdominal examination and vaginal examination in scar pregnancy(CSP). Methods 58 cases of suspected CSP patients in our hospital during December 2015 and November 2017 were selected as the study subjects. All the patients received color Doppler ultrasound and abdominal and vaginal color Doppler ultrasound examination under the guidance of the physicians. The ultrasonic results were compared with the postoperative pathological results. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and coincidence rates were compared between the two examination methods of color Doppler ultrasound. Results The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity rates of transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of uterine scar were higher than those of transabdominal ultrasound ultrasound(97.37% vs 81.58%, 95.00% vs 75.00%, P<0.05). Of the 38 patients examined by abdominal color Doppler ultrasound, cystic echo, gestational sac, mixed echoes were detected in 31 cases, and the results were detected in 37 cases by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound. The diagnostic coincidence rate of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound examination was significantly higher than that of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound examination(P<0.05). Conclusion Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography has a higher diagnostic accuracy rate than transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of CSP.
Key words:  Trans-abdominal color Doppler sonography  Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound  Scar pregnancy(CSP)  Diagnostic value