引用本文:席剑雾,周翌炜,叶剑强.超声弹性成像对校正BI-RADS-US 3类及4类乳腺肿块的诊断价值[J].中国临床新医学,2020,13(6):599-602.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1824次   下载 1347 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
超声弹性成像对校正BI-RADS-US 3类及4类乳腺肿块的诊断价值
席剑雾,周翌炜,叶剑强
214187 江苏,无锡市惠山区人民医院超声医学科(席剑雾,周翌炜),病理科(叶剑强)
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 分析超声弹性成像对校正乳腺超声影像报告数据系统(Breast Imaging and Reporting System Ultrasound,BI-RADS-US)3类及4类乳腺肿块的诊断价值。方法 对常规BI-RADS-US分类法诊断为3类及4类的乳腺肿块用超声弹性成像进行校正,以病理结果为金标准,对比分析校正前后的BI-RADS-US分类法对乳腺肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断效能。结果 常规BI-RADS-US分类法诊断乳腺良恶性肿块的灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为75.6%、88.1%、83.8%,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.836。经超声弹性成像校正后BI-RADS-US分类法的诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为82.9%、93.1%、90.8%,ROC曲线下面积为0.918。校正前后ROC曲线下面积比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 弹性成像有助于提高超声对BI-RADS-US 3类及4类乳腺肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断效能。
关键词:  超声弹性成像  校正  乳腺肿块  乳腺超声影像报告数据系统
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2020.06.14
分类号:R 445.1
基金项目:
Value of BI-RADS-US rectified by ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of type 3 and type 4 breast lumps
XI Jian-wu, ZHOU Yi-wei, YE Jian-qiang
Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Wuxi Huishan District People′s Hospital, Jiangsu 214187, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the value of Breast Imaging and Reporting System Ultrasound(BI-RADS-US) rectified by ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of type 3 and type 4 breast lumps. Methods Breast lumps of type 3 and type 4 diagnosed by conventional BI-RADS-US classification were diagnosed by ultrasound elastography as rectification. With the pathological results as the gold standard, the efficacies of BI-RADS-US classification were compared and analyzed in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors before and after rectification. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the conventional BI-RADS-US classification were 75.6%, 88.1% and 83.8% respectively in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was 0.836. The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the BI-RADS-US classification with ultrasound elastography rectification were 82.9%, 93.1% and 90.8% respectively, and the area under ROC curve was 0.918. There were significant differences in the areas under ROC curve before and after rectification(P<0.05). Conclusion Elastography is conducive to improving the diagnostic efficacies of ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors of BI-RADS-US type 3 and type 4.
Key words:  Ultrasound elastography  Rectification  Breast lumps  Breast Imaging and Reporting System Ultrasound(BI-RADS-US)