引用本文:丁玲玲,金朝海,张 宏.不同诱导方法对老年高危患者麻醉气管插管安全性比较[J].中国临床新医学,2010,3(3):221-224.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1436次   下载 1136 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
不同诱导方法对老年高危患者麻醉气管插管安全性比较
丁玲玲,金朝海,张 宏
100853 北京,中国人民解放军总医院麻醉手术中心
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 比较不同全麻诱导插管对老年患者循环系统的影响。方法 80例择期手术的老年病人,随机分为两组,I组采用健忘镇痛慢诱导法,Ⅱ组采用静脉快速诱导法,进行气管插管全身麻醉。记录静卧首次(T0)、给药后2 min(T1)、插管前(T2)、插管即刻(T3)、插管后1 min(T4)、插管后3 min(T5)、插管后5 min(T6)的HR、MAP、SpO2,观察不良反应发生情况。结果 T0时两组MAP和HR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与T0时比较,Ⅰ组各时刻MAP和HR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与T0时比较,Ⅱ组T1~2MAP降低(P<0.05);与T0时比较,Ⅱ组T3~5MAP升高(P<0.05);与T0时比较,Ⅱ组T2HR降低(P<0.05);与T0时比较,Ⅱ组T3~5HR升高(P<0.05);与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组高血压和心动过速增多(P<0.05)。结论 与静脉快诱导相比健忘镇痛慢诱导法用于老年人更为安全,对血流动力学影响小,并发症少。
关键词:  诱导方法  老年  麻醉  安全性
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2010.03.05
分类号:R 614.2
基金项目:
Safety comparison of different anesthesia induction method for endotracheal intubation general anesthesia in high-risk elderly patients
DING Ling-ling,Jin Chao-hai,Zhang Hong,et al.
The Center of Anesthesia Surgery of the PLA General Hospital of China,Beijing 100853,China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To compare the effects of different anesthesia induction and tracheal intubation on circulatory system in elderly patients.Methods Eighty elderly patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups, Ⅰ group were treated with amnesia induced slow analgesia method;Ⅱ group were treated with intravenous rapid induction method for endotracheal intubation general anesthesia. HR,MAP and SpO2 at repose time(T0), 2min after administration (T1), before intubation (T2), immediate intubation (T3), 1 min after intubation (T4), 3 min after intubation (T5), 5 min after intubation (T6) were recorded. The occurrence of adverse reaction were observed.Results At T0 MAP and HR in the two groups was no significant difference (P>0.05); when compared with T0, MAP and HR at all time inⅠgroup was no significant difference (P>0.05); and compared with T0,MAP at T1~2 in Ⅱ group was lower (P<0.05); when compared with T0, MAP at T3~5 in Ⅱ group was higher (P<0.05); when compared with T0, HR at T2 inⅡ group was lower (P<0.05); and compared with T0, HR at T3~5 inⅡ group was higher (P<0.05); compared with group Ⅰ,incidence of hypertension and tachycardia was higher(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the rapid intravenous analgesia amnesia slow-induced analgesia method is more secure in the elderly patients, the impact on hemodynamics is small, with few complications.
Key words:  Induction method  Old  Anesthesia  Security