| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 比较两种暂封材料在根管治疗中的应用效果。方法 选取158例需进行根管治疗的患者，随机分成两组，分别采用Cavition暂封王（A组）和氧化锌丁香油水门汀（B组）作为暂封材料，并观察二者在单面洞和复面洞的临床暂封效果。结果 Cavition暂封王成功率为98.98%，氧化锌丁香油水门汀成功率为84.34%，前者高于后者（P<0.01）。结论 Cavition暂封王是一种较为理想的暂封材料。 |
| 关键词: 根管治疗 Cavition暂封王 微渗漏 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2011.03.22 |
| 分类号:R 783.1 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Observation on clinical application of two temporary restorative materials in root canal therapy |
|
FANG Ping,CHEN Yan,WEI Yi, et al.
|
|
Department of Stomatology,the People′s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning 530021,China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To compare two temporary restorative materials′ sealability in root canal therapy.Methods One hundred and fifty-eight patients who needed to do root canal therapy were randomly divided into 2 groups. Their teeth were instrumented and filled with zinc phosphate cement and Cavition temporary restorative ointment respectively. The sealability of two materials were compared in sinple cavity and complex cavity.Results The success rate of Cavition group was 98.98%, zinc phosphate group cement was 84.34%, the success rate of Cavition group was significant higher than that of zinc phosphate cement group(P<0.01). Conclusion Cavition temporary restorative ointment shows good sealability. It was an ideal temporary restorative materials. |
| Key words: Root canal therapy Cavition temporary restorative ointment Microleakage |
