引用本文:李大建,陈 华,龚犁玲.正畸微种植体治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)的临床疗效评价[J].中国临床新医学,2013,6(2):130-133.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1399次   下载 1361 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
正畸微种植体治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)的临床疗效评价
李大建,陈 华,龚犁玲
541001 广西,桂林市口腔医院正畸科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨微种植体在安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)矫治中的应用效果,为临床推广使用微种植体提供理论依据。方法 选取安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)患者64例,其中男性32例,女性32例,年龄(22.78±3.26)岁。患者随机分为对照组和实验组,对照组采用口外J钩进行矫治,实验组采用微型种植体支抗进行矫治,治疗结束后,分析两组治疗前后头影和模型测量指标的变化。结果 头影测量结果显示两组矫治后的ANB、Ls-E、L1-NB、Li-E、UI-SN、U1-L1、U1-MP、U1-NA和SNA等指标较矫治前均显著减小(P<0.05或<0.01),而U6-PP较矫治前显著增大(P<0.05);实验组矫治后的ANB、Ls-E、Li-E、UI-SN、U1-L1、U1-NA、U6-PP和SNA等指标均优于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组治疗疗程为(18±2)个月,实验组治疗疗程为(12±2)个月,实验组显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组矫治后覆盖(OJ)和覆(牙合)(OB)均较矫治前显著减小(P<0.01),实验组OJ和OB均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 微种植体能够有效矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)。
关键词:  微种植体  安氏Ⅱ类1分类  正畸
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2013.02.12
分类号:R 78
基金项目:
Clinical effect evaluation of micro-implant in the treatment of Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion
LI Da-jian, CHEN Hua, GONG Li-ling
Department of Orthodontic Division,Guilin Stomatological Hospital,Guangxi 541001, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To investigated the effect of micro-implant in the treatment of Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 classification and provide a theoretical basis for clinical promotion of the use of micro- implant.Methods Sixty-four patients with Angle Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion, 32women and 32 men,with average age of (22.78±3.26)years old, were randomly divided into control and experimental groups.In the control group,the patients treated with J hook,in the experimental group,the patients treated with micro-implant,before and after treatment, the change of cephalometric and model indexs were measured and analyzed.Results Two groups could take the correction of Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, but in the experimental group ANB Ls-E, U1-L1, U1-MP, U1-NA, U6-PP, the SNA indicators more well than those in the control group (P<0.05 or <0.01). The control group treatment course was (18±2)months, the experimental groups treatment course of (12±2)months, in the experimental group was significantly reduced treatment time(P<0.05). In the index of OJ and OB,the experimental group was better than the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion Micro-implant treatment could corrected Angle Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion well.
Key words:  Micro-implant  Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion  Orthodontics