| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 观察米索前列醇不同给药途径终止早期妊娠的临床效果。方法 选择到该院门诊自愿要求药物流产终止妊娠的早期妊娠妇女146例，按就诊次序分成A、B两组，各73例。A组米索前列醇口服给药，B组米索前列醇阴道给药。观察两种给药途径的流产效果。结果 A组完全流产率为91.8%，B组完全流产率为97.3%，两组流产效果差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 早期药物流产方案中，以米索前列醇阴道给药优于口服给药。 |
| 关键词: 药物流产 米索前列醇 给药途径 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2013.03.18 |
| 分类号:R 711 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Effect comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the terminatiom of the early pregnancy |
|
SU Ze-ying
|
|
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Wuzhou, Guangxi 543002,China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To compare the differences of two misoprostol’s route of administration in the early drug abortion scheme.Methods One hundred and forty-six early pregnancy women who demanded drug abortion were randomly divided into group A and group B(each group=73).The abortion effects of two misoprostol’s route of administration in the early drug abortion scheme were abserved,including the oral administration（A gruop） and the vagina’administration(B group).Results The rate of abortion of A group was 91.8% while that of B group was 97.3%. There was significant difference in the abortion rate between two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion In the early drug abortion scheme,misoprostol’s vagina administration has better effect than oral administration. |
| Key words: Drug abortion Misoprostol Route of administration |
