引用本文:柳赪琥,王世刚.股骨近端防旋髓内钉微创治疗糖尿病与非糖尿病患者股骨粗隆间骨折的效果比较分析[J].中国临床新医学,2015,8(12):1178-1181.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1327次   下载 1310 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
股骨近端防旋髓内钉微创治疗糖尿病与非糖尿病患者股骨粗隆间骨折的效果比较分析
柳赪琥,王世刚
744600 甘肃,庄浪县人民医院骨科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)微创治疗糖尿病与非糖尿病患者股骨粗隆间骨折的效果。方法 收集2012-08~2014-08该院骨科收治的股骨粗隆间骨折患者87例,其中非糖尿病患者48例,糖尿病患者39例。采用麻醉及C臂的帮助下牵引床闭合复位满意后,行PFNA内固定治疗。结果 非糖尿病组患者术后并发症发生率(8.33%)低于糖尿病组(51.28%)。两组比较髋关节功能Harris评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 糖尿病患者PFNA微创治疗股骨粗隆间骨折疗效与非糖尿病患者相当,但其并发症发生率较非糖尿病患者高。
关键词:  股骨近端防旋髓内钉  微创  股骨粗隆间骨折  糖尿病患者
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2015.12.21
分类号:R 683.42
基金项目:
Comparative analysis of the proximal fenmur nail anti-rotation on diabetic and non-diabetic patients with intertrochanteric fracture
LIU Cheng-hu, WANG Shi-gang
Department of Orthopedics the People′s Hospital of Zhuanglang County, Gansu 744660, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To explore the prognosis of proximal femur prevent rotation intramedullary nailing(PFNA) on diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients with intertrochanteric fractures.Methods Eighty-seven patients with intertrochanteric fractures were collected in our hospital from August 2010 to August 2012, among which 48 patients were in the non-diabetic group and 39 patients in the diabetic group. The satisfied help of C arm and closed reduction by the traction bed PFNA internal fixation treatment was performed after anesthesia.Methods The incidence of postoperative complications in the non-diabetic group(8.33%) was less than that in the diabetic group(51.28%).There was no significant difference in Harris score of hip function between the two groups.Conclusion The curative effect of PFNA internal fixation treatment on diabetic patients with intertrochanteric fracture is similar to that on non-diabetic patients. However, the incidence of complications is higher in diabetic patients.
Key words:  Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)  Minimally invasive  Intertrochanteric fractures  Diabetes patients