| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 观察内镜辅助置导尿管治疗尿道球部断裂的临床疗效。方法 选取2011-12～2013-12该院收治的50例尿道球部断裂患者，采用随机单盲法分成研究组和对照组各25例。研究组给予内镜辅助置导尿管治疗，对照组给予开放性手术治疗。比较两组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间及临床疗效。结果 两组手术成功率和尿流率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。研究组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 内镜辅助置导尿管治疗尿道球部断裂临床疗效显著，可有效缩短手术时间和住院时间，且术后无明显不良反应，具有临床推广应用价值。 |
| 关键词: 内镜 尿道球部断裂 临床疗效 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2016.03.16 |
| 分类号:R 695 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Efficacy of endoscopic catheter set on bulbar urethral rupture |
|
HE Ling-sheng, DENG Shao-zhen, LI Yan-fen
|
|
Department of Urology Surgery, Dongguan Fenggang Hospital, Guangdong 523690, China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To study the clinical efficacy of endoscopic catheter set on bulbar urethra fracture treatment.Methods Fifty patients with bulbar urethral rupture were collected from our hospital from December 2011 to December 2013, and divided into the study group and the control group, with 25 cases in each group. The study group received endoscopic treatment using catheter set while the control group received open surgery. The blood loss, the operative time, the length of stay and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences in the success rate and urinary flow rate between the two groups(P>0.05). The blood loss, the operative time, the length of hospital stay and surgical costs in the study group were significantly less or shorter than those in the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion The endoscopic treatment of urethral catheter set is effective, with a shorter operation time and hospital stay. |
| Key words: Endoscopy Bulbar urethral rupture Clinical efficacy |
