引用本文:黄锐.伤椎置钉GSS系统与传统手术治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果比较[J].中国临床新医学,2017,10(5):470-472.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2047次   下载 1207 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
伤椎置钉GSS系统与传统手术治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果比较
黄锐
546100 广西,来宾市人民医院骨二科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨伤椎置钉GSS系统在胸腰段脊柱骨折患者治疗中的临床应用效果。方法 选取该院2010-03~2016-03收治的胸腰段脊柱骨折患者200例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各100例,对照组采用传统手术进行治疗,观察组采用伤椎置钉GSS系统进行治疗。术后第2周比较两组临床疗效。结果 观察组治疗后椎体后缘高度、椎体前缘高度、Cobb角均优于对照组(P<0.01);观察组治疗有效率高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 伤椎置钉GSS系统在治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折中可使患者临床症状得到明显改善,可显著提高临床疗效,具有推广应用价值。
关键词:  伤椎置钉GSS系统  胸腰段脊柱骨折
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.05.21
分类号:R 68
基金项目:
Comparison of the clinical effects between injured vertebral GSS nailing system and traditional operation on thoracic lumbar spine fractures
HUANG Rui
The Second Department of Orthopedics, the People′s Hospital of Laibin City, Guangxi 546100, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effect of injured vertebral GSS nailing system on the patients with thoracic lumbar spine fracture.Methods 200 patients with thoracic lumbar spine fractures in our Hospital from March 2010 to March 2016 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 100 cases in each group. The control group received the traditional surgical treatment and the observation group was treated with the injured vertebral GSS nailing system. The clinical effects were compared between the two groups.Results The trailing edge height of vertebral bodies, anterior flange height and Cobb Angle in the observation group were better than those in the control group(P<0.01). The effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion GSS pedicle screw system is effective in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fractures.
Key words:  Injured vertebral GSS nailing system  Thoracic lumbar spine fractures