引用本文:刘久英,王 琳,王传香,曹 铭,宋晓婕.胎盘早剥167例发生原因及母婴结局分析[J].中国临床新医学,2017,10(10):937-940.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1954次   下载 1287 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
胎盘早剥167例发生原因及母婴结局分析
刘久英,王 琳,王传香,曹 铭,宋晓婕
430016 湖北,华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院(武汉市妇幼保健院)妇产科(刘久英,曹 铭,宋晓婕),超声影像科(王传香);530021 南宁,广西壮族自治区人民医院妇产科(王 琳)
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨胎盘早剥高危因素、发病诱因、临床表现及母婴结局。方法 收集2007-01~2012-12在武汉市妇女儿童医疗保健中心住院确诊的胎盘早剥167例患者的临床资料并进行回顾性分析。结果 胎盘早剥发生率为0.56%,有明确发病诱因者占62.87%(105/167),以胎膜早破(premature rupture of fetalmembranes,PROM)、妊娠期高血压疾病、机械性因素、双胎、催产等为主。临床表现主要为阴道流血、腹痛、腰痛、胎心监护异常或宫缩过频等。B超检出率为39.74%。Ⅰ度胎盘早剥占54.49%(91/167),Ⅱ度占22.75%(38/167),Ⅲ度占22.75%(38/167)。从患者出现临床症状到其来医院就诊、从来医院到手术或阴道分娩时间 Ⅱ、Ⅲ 度胎盘早剥组均长于 Ⅰ 度胎盘早剥组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。产后出血30例,子宫胎盘卒中31例,子宫次全切除4例,弥散性血管内凝血(disseminated intravascular coagulation,DIC)3例;死胎死产10例,早产及新生儿窒息转新生儿监护病房(neonatal intenisve care unit,NICU)71例。结论 胎盘早剥临床表现无特异性,部分患者有临床高危因素;超声容易漏诊;从发病到临床处理时间是影响胎盘早剥程度及母婴预后的重要因素。
关键词:  胎盘早剥  高危因素  母婴结局
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.10.01
分类号:R 714
基金项目:湖北省卫计委科研课题(编号:WJ2017F041)
Clinical analysis of placental abruption in 167 cases
LIU Jiu-ying, WANG Lin, WANG Chuan-xiang, et al.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Wuhan Children′s Hospital(Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Hubei 430016, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To explore the high-risk factors, pathogenesis and clinical manifestions of placental abruption.Methods The clinical data of 167 cases with placental abruption in Wuhan Children Hospital from January 2007 to December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed.Results The incidence of placental abruption was 0.56% in 167 cases,among whom 105 cases had the main predisposing factors(62.87%), including premature rupture of fetalmembranes(PROM), hypertensive disorders, complicating pregnancy, traumatic factors, twins and hasten parturition. The main clinical manifestations included vaginal hemorrhage, abdomen pain, fetal heart rate abnormalities and uterine hypertonia. The ultrasonography detection rate was 39.74%. The first-degree placental abruption rate was 54.49%. The second-degree placental abruption rate was 22.75%, and the third-degree placental abruption rate was 22.75%. It needed more time for the patients with the second and the third degree of placental abruption from the onset of the initial clinical sign to the treatment than the patients with the first degree of placental abruption, but there was no significant difference in the time between the two groups(P>0.05). After the delivery, postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 30 cases,uteroplacental apoplexy in 31 cases, subtotal hysterectomy in 4 cases, disseminated intravascular coagulation(DIC) in 3 cases, fetal death in 10 cases. and 71 premature neonates were transferred to the neonatal intenisve care unit(NICU).Conclusion There are nonspecific clinical manifestations of placental abruption. Some cases have high-risk factors while others are misdiagnosed by ultrasound examination. The time from onset of the initial clinical signs to the treatment affects the prognosis of placental abruption.
Key words:  Placental abruption  High-risk factors  Maternal-fetal outcome