引用本文:溥弋棋,吴艾柯,赵昱翰,王佳佳,方乐琴,罗 雪,张 斌.中文版福特应激性失眠反应测验在短期失眠障碍患者中的心理测量学特征[J].中国临床新医学,2024,17(1):6-11.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 258次   下载 429 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
中文版福特应激性失眠反应测验在短期失眠障碍患者中的心理测量学特征
溥弋棋,吴艾柯,赵昱翰,王佳佳,方乐琴,罗 雪,张 斌
南方医科大学南方医院精神心理科(睡眠医学中心),广州 510515
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 验证中文版福特应激性失眠反应测验(FIRST-C)在短期失眠障碍(STID)患者中的心理测量学特征。方法 于2017年11月至2019年6月期间在南方医科大学南方医院门诊招募STID患者172例(STID组),另选取睡眠良好对照者(GSC)150名(GSC组)。采用FIRST-C、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)、艾普沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)进行评估。其中72例STID患者在3个月后接受重测。结果 STID组的FIRST-C总分显著高于GSC组(P<0.05)。探索性因子分析显示,FIRST-C具有单因子结构,可解释方差百分比为51.04%,各条目因子载荷范围在0.405~0.828之间。STID组的FIRST-C评分与ESS评分呈中度正相关(rs=0.498,P<0.001),与HADS评分呈轻度正相关(rs=0.174,P=0.024),与ISI评分不相关(rs=0.001,P=0.995)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析结果显示FIRST-C鉴别STID和GSC的最佳划界分值为19.5分。信度分析显示,Cronbach′s α系数和Spearman-Brown分半信度分别为0.873、0.864,条目得分与总分的相关系数范围为0.326~0.752。3个月后复测FIRST-C总分与初测FIRST-C总分差异有统计学意义(t=5.440,P<0.001)。结论 FIRST-C评估STID患者的睡眠反应性具有较好的心理测量学特征。
关键词:  福特应激性失眠反应测验  短期失眠障碍  效度  信度
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2024.01.02
分类号:
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2021YFC2501500);南方医科大学南方医院临床研究专项项目(编号:2021CR009);2021年院级教育研究课题-重点培育项目(编号:21NJ-ZDPY01)
Psychometric characteristics of the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test—Chinese version in patients with short-term insomnia disorder
PU Yiqi, WU Aike, ZHAO Yuhan, WANG Jiajia, FANG Leqin, LUO Xue, ZHANG Bin
Department of Psychiatry(Sleep Medicine Center), Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To validate the psychometric characteristics of the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test—Chinese version(FIRST-C) in patients with short-term insomnia disorder(STID). Methods One hundred and seventy-two STID patients were recruited as the STID group from the outpatient clinic of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University between November 2017 and June 2019, and 150 good-sleeper controls(GSC) were selected as the GSC group. The patients were evaluated using FIRST-C, Insomnia Severity Index(ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale(ESS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS). Among them, 72 STID patients underwent retesting after 3 months. Results The total scores of FIRST-C in the STID group were significantly higher than those in the GSC group(P<0.05). Exploratory factor analysis revealed that FIRST-C exhibited a single-factor structure, explaining 51.04% of the variance, with item factor loadings ranging from 0.405 to 0.828. The FIRST-C scores in the STID group showed a moderate possitive correlation with ESS(rs=0.498, P<0.001), a mild correlation with HADS score(rs=0.174, P=0.024) and non significant correlation with ISI score(rs=0.001, P=0.995). The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis revealed an optimum cut-off score of 19.5 points for FIRST-C identifying STID and GSC. Reliability analysis indicated that Cronbach′s α coefficient was 0.873 and Spearman-Brown split-half reliability was 0.864, with item and total score correlation coefficient ranging from 0.326 to 0.752. Moreover, there was statistically significant difference between the total scores of FIRST-C at the 3-month retest and those at the initial test(t=5.440, P<0.001). Conclusion The FIRST-C demonstrates better psychometric characteristics for assessing sleep reactivity in patients with STID.
Key words:  The Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test  Short-term insomnia disorder  Validity  Reliability