引用本文:王 皓,杨 波,林英忠,徐广马,刘 伶.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影两种导管的应用效果观察[J].中国临床新医学,2009,2(11):1202-1204.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1537次   下载 1145 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
经桡动脉冠状动脉造影两种导管的应用效果观察
王 皓,杨 波,林英忠,徐广马,刘 伶
430060 湖北,武汉大学人民医院[王 皓(武汉大学在职研究生,工作单位:广西壮族自治区人民医院),杨 波];530021 南宁,广西壮族自治区人民医院(林英忠, 徐广马, 刘 伶)
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 观察常规经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影(CAG)两种导管的应用效果。方法 将经桡动脉途径行CAG的203例患者随机分为两组, 一组用多功能造影导管(100例);另一组选用6F Judkins型造影导管(103例)。对比观察两组手术成功率、冠脉造影X线透视时间和手术操作时间。结果 多功能导管组手术成功98例(98.0%), 不成功2例(2.0%);Judkins导管组手术成功102例(99.0%),不成功1例(1%),两组成功率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组造影透视时间和手术操作时间相比差异有统计学显著意义(P<0.05)。结论 使用多功能导管动脉途径行CAG安全、可靠、减少X线照射时间。
关键词:  冠状动脉造影术  桡动脉  心脏导管插入术
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2009.11.36
分类号:R 445.2
基金项目:
The Catheter application in transradial cronary artery angiography
WANG Hao, YANG Bo, LIN Ying- zhong, et al.
The People′s Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei 430600, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the choise of different catheter in coronary angiography (CAG) by transradial artery approach.Methods Two hundred and three patients were randomly divided into two groups, one group used multi-functional imaging catheter (100 cases); the other group selected Judkins-type catheter (n=103 cases). The success rate of coronary angiography, X-ray fluoroscopy time and the operation time between the two groups were observed.Results In multi-catheter group the success rate was 98.0%, 2 cases was unsuccessful ; In Judkins catheter group the success rate was 99.0% (102/103). And the X-ray fluoroscopy time between groups was also significant different (P<0.05).Conclusion The use of multi-functional catheter is safe and reliable in CAG, and also can reduce the X ray exposure.
Key words:  Coronary artery angiography  Radial artery  Cardiac catheterization