引用本文:钱丽松.腹腔镜联合阴式全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的临床效果比较[J].中国临床新医学,2011,4(10):944-946.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1312次   下载 1023 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
腹腔镜联合阴式全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的临床效果比较
钱丽松
225400 江苏,泰兴市中医院妇产科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 比较腹腔镜联合阴式全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的临床效果。方法 分析43例采用腹腔镜联合阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)患者的临床资料,并与同期抽取的50例经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)患者进行比较。结果 两组手术均顺利,未出现手术并发症,在术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间,LAVH组均少于TAH组(P<0.01);而手术时间LAVH组长于TAH组(P<0.01)。结论 LAVH术后恢复快、伤口美观、愈合好,值得临床推广应用。
关键词:  腹腔镜联合阴式全子宫切除术  经腹全子宫切除术
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2011.10.12
分类号:R 713.4+2
基金项目:
The comparison of clinical effect between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy
QIAN Li-song
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Taixing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu 225400,China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy(TAH). Methods The clinical data of forty-three patients undergoing LAVH were compared with those of 50 patients undergoing TAH.Results Two groups were performed smoothly, with no complications. The bleeding measurement during surgery, anal exhaust time, hospitalization time, in group LAVH were less than those in group TAH(P<0.01). And the time of the operation in LAVH was longer than that in group TAH(P<0.01). Conclusion LAVH has advantages of faster recovery, wound beautiful appearance, and good healing. LAVH is worth clinical application.
Key words:  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)  Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)