引用本文:苏凌春,余 琳.子宫颈扩张球囊与缩宫素应用于足月妊娠引产的疗效比较[J].中国临床新医学,2014,7(7):618-621.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1447次   下载 1167 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
子宫颈扩张球囊与缩宫素应用于足月妊娠引产的疗效比较
苏凌春,余 琳
528200 广东,佛山市南海区妇幼保健院妇产科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 比较子宫颈扩张球囊与催产素应用于足月妊娠引产中的疗效与安全性。方法 将住院分娩的60例足月妊娠孕妇随机分为球囊组30例和缩宫素组30例,观察两组治疗前后宫颈Bishop评分变化情况、给药后临产发动时间及分娩方式、分娩时间、产妇及围产儿一般情况。结果 球囊组治疗前后宫颈成熟度Bishop评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);球囊组治疗开始至临产时间、临产至分娩时间均短于缩宫素组(P<0.01);球囊组顺产率高于缩宫素组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 子宫颈扩张球囊用于足月妊娠引产疗效安全、可靠。
关键词:  子宫颈扩张球囊  缩宫素  足月引产
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2014.07.12
分类号:R 714
基金项目:
Comparison between the Cook balloon catheter and oxytocin in labor induction at term
SU Ling-chun, YU Lin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Maternal and Child Health Care of Nanhai District of Foshan, Guangdong 528200,China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To observe the effectiveness and safety of the Cook balloon catheter versus oxytocin in labor induction at term.Methods Sixty pregnant women at term hospitalised in obstetric department of our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups: the Cook balloon catheter group(30 cases) and oxytocin group(30 cases).The improvement of cervical conditions was compared before and after the application. The labor time,fetus delivery method and time,conditions of maternal and newborn health were compared between two groups.Results The cervical Bishop score was significantly higher after applying the Cook balloon catheter (P<0.05). Compared with the oxytocin group, the time from application to labor and the time from labor to delivery in the Cook group were shorter(P<0.01), the natural childbirth rate was higher in Cook group,and the differences were significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Application of the Cook balloon catheter is effective and safe in labor induction at term.
Key words:  Cook balloon catheter  Oxytocin  Labor induction at term