| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 观察揿针联合中药治疗肺经蕴热型慢性鼻炎的临床疗效。方法 选择2021年4月至2022年4月南京中医药大学附属医院耳鼻喉科收治的肺经蕴热型慢性鼻炎患者60例，采用随机数字表法将其分为观察组和对照组，每组30例。观察组采用揿针联合口服中药治疗，对照组采用布地奈德鼻喷雾剂治疗，均连续治疗28 d。比较两组治疗前以及治疗后第14、28天的症状、体征评分，并评估两组临床疗效。结果 两组治疗后症状、体征评分均呈下降趋势，治疗后14 d和28 d的评分均较同组治疗前显著降低（P<0.05），但两组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两组临床疗效相当，总有效率比较差异无统计学意义（90.00% vs 93.33%，P>0.05）。结论 揿针联合中药治疗肺经蕴热型慢性鼻炎有良好的临床疗效。 |
| 关键词: 慢性鼻炎 揿针 中药 临床疗效 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2023.01.09 |
| 分类号:R 726.1 |
| 基金项目:国家中医临床研究基地开放课题（编号：JD201701） |
|
| Observation on the clinical efficacy of press-needle combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine in treatment of chronic rhinitis with heat accumulation in the lung channel |
|
QIU Xin-ying, XUE Shan-shan, SUN Xin-chen, et al.
|
|
Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine(Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Jiangsu 210029, China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of press-needle combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine in treatment of chronic rhinitis with heat accumulation in the lung channel. Methods Sixty patients suffering from chronic rhinitis with heat accumulation in the lung channel who were admitted to Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from April 2021 to April 2022 were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with press-needle combined with oral Traditional Chinese Medicine, while the control group was treated with budesonide nasal spray. Both of the two groups were treated continuously for 28 days. The symptoms and signs scores were compared between the two groups before treatment and on the 14th day and 28th day after treatment, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated in the two groups. Results The symptoms and signs scores showed a downward trend in the two groups after treatment, and 14 and 28 days after treatment, the scores in the two groups were significantly lower than those in the same group before treatment(P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05). The clinical effects of the two groups were similar, and there was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups(90.00% vs 93.33%, P>0.05). Conclusion Press-needle combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine has a good clinical efficacy in treatment of chronic rhinitis with heat accumulation in the lung channel. |
| Key words: Chronic rhinitis Press-needle Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical efficacy |
