引用本文:包艾玲,刘顺涛.改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫全切术的临床应用效果比较[J].中国临床新医学,2016,9(1):54-56.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1627次   下载 1439 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫全切术的临床应用效果比较
包艾玲,刘顺涛
404000 重庆,重庆市万州区第一人民医院妇产科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫全切术的临床应用效果。方法 选择2010-05~2013-03该院行腹腔镜筋膜内子宫全切术及腹腔镜子宫全切病例162例,根据手术方法不同分为观察组(腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术)及对照组(腹腔镜子宫全切术)各81例,对两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后病率、住院费用、住院床日、术后性生活恢复、息肉、残端感染、副损伤进行比较。结果 两组手术时间,术中出血量、术后病率、住院费用、住院床日、术后性生活时间、息肉、残端感染、副损伤比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术副损伤少,术中出血量少,值得临床推广。
关键词:  改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术  腹腔镜子宫全切术  临床应用价值
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2016.01.18
分类号:R 713.4+2
基金项目:
Comparative study of laparoscopic total removal of internal improvements fascial hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy
BAO Ai-ling, LIU Shun-tao
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, the First People′s Hospital of Wanzhou District of Chongqing City, Chongqing 404000, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To study the key points and clinical value of modified laparoscopic hysterectomy.Methods One hundred and sixty-two patients were collected in our hospital from May 2010 to March 2013 and were randomly divided into two groups, the treatment grouup(laparoscopic fascial hysterectomy) and the control group(laparoscopic hysterectomy). The operative time, blood loss, postoperative morbidity, hospital costs, hospitalization days, sexual satisfaction after operation, polyps, stump infection and side injury were compared between the two groups.Results There were significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, postoperative morbidity, hospital costs, hospitalization days, sex satisfaction after operation, polyps, stump infection and side injury between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Modified laparoscopic fascial hysterectomy is effective with less side injury and less bleeding.
Key words:  Improved laparoscopic hysterectomy within fascia  Laparoscopic hysterectomy  Clinical value