| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 探讨猪尾巴导管（一次性引流导管）加负压引流治疗液气胸效果与临床价值。方法 将78例液气胸患者采用随机数字法分为两组，39例给予猪尾巴导管加负压引流（观察组），39例给予传统胸腔闭式引流（对照组），比较两组治疗效果及其他指标。结果 猪尾巴导管加负压引流治疗液气胸在疼痛程度、手术时间、手术切口等方面的疗效优于传统胸腔闭式引流，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 猪尾巴导管加负压引流治疗液气胸疗效确切明显，具有手术时间短、患者痛苦程度轻、无明显并发症、无手术切口的优点，可改善患者生活质量。 |
| 关键词: 猪尾巴导管（一次性引流导管） 负压引流 液气胸 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2016.07.05 |
| 分类号:R 56；R 61 |
| 基金项目:广东茂名市科技计划项目(编号:2013228) |
|
| Comparison of the clinical effects between pig tail catheter with negative pressure drainage and traditional chest closed drainage in the treatment of pneumothorax |
|
CHEN Ying, LIN Wan-li, GONG Lan-juan, et al.
|
|
Department of Thoracic Surgery, the People′s Hospital of Gaozhou, Guangdong 525200, China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To study the clinical effects and clinical values of pig tail catheter(disposable drainage catheter) with negative pressure drainage and traditional chest closed drainage in the treatment of pneumothorax.Methods Seventy-eight patients with pneumothorax were divided into two groups by the random number table method.The treatment group(n=39) was treated by pig tail catheter with negative pressure drainage, and the control group(n=39) was treated by traditional chest closed drainage. The clinical effects and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.Results The treatment group had a better clinical effect, shorter operation time and shorter length of operative incision than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Pig tail catheter with negative pressure drainage is safe and effective in the treatment of pneumothorax. |
| Key words: Pig tail catheter(disposable drainage catheter) Subatmospheric pressure drainage Hydropneumothorax |
